New feature ideas

This helps prepare management and communicate with staff member for performance review, and any salary review.

Currently when an onboarding employee has not submitted the required qualifications it shows them as Awaiting Approval. This means wasted Admin time looking at the qualification to approve it only to see it hasn't been submitted. The option to have qualifications noted as Missing is there, so this is what should be showing up when the employee has not submitted them.

When selecting a replacement for a vacant shift/cover request, it would be helpful to be able to be able to see the applying staff members’ rostered shifts either side of the shift they are intending to pick up. E.g. John is applying to cover a vacant shift on the 2nd of December, so his roster from the 1st to 3rd of December shows up (under ‘Select Employee’) and I can see what shifts he is working/not working across these days. Helps to prevent staff from being accidentally approved to work from close into open (insufficient shift gap) or working twice in one day when there is another willing candidate.

It will assist with rostering as we have a 3 week minimum lead time for annual leave requests but are unable to enforce this currently with Tanda

Forms - Text box - Currently Hyperlink opens in same browser tab and over-rides the Tanda form It would be great if you could change the hyperlink behaviour to open the link in a new tab because the target is usually on another website and the link is a detour from the standard workflow in Tanda (i.e. typically the link is a help page/resource, used as reference, in the middle of a multi-step form)

We have had several people accept a position, complete onboarding but not actually start. It would be good to have an option where we can record "did not start" as a deactivation reason.

Where an employee is seasonal and say they have a start date of 8/1/2024 are terminated say on 30/03/2024 but then is rehired on the 10/01/2025 you want to reactivate but do not want them to be able to be rostered prior to their new start date

Reporting: The current 'Form report' does not provide any employee detail just statistics and does not cater to multi-stage approvals. Is it possible to upgrade the current forms screen (HR > Forms > All Forms) with the 'Tools' function that staff screen and leave screen have? Based on the filters chosen on the screen the user could export as csv and use the data for reporting/analysis. This would then include all employee details Status: Can the 'Approved' and 'Pending Approval' status be upgraded to cater for multi-stage so we can see where in the multi-stage approval process they are at.... E.g. Approved - now means fully approved - all stages have been approved Maybe the status could display as something like: Approved (n approved / n approvals required) Approved (1/1) Approved (2/2) Approved (3/3) E.g. Pending approval - now means no approvals, or partially approved Maybe the status could display as something like: Pending Approval (n approved / n approvals required) Pending Approval (0/1) ie 0 out of 1 required approval Pending Approval (1/2) ie 1 out of 2 required approvals Pending Approval (2/3) ie 2 out of 3 required approvals Filters: Ability to filter on status, i.e. All Pending Approval (all status starting with 'Pending approval*' if employing status naming as per above suggestion) Additional fields: The 'Sent Contracts' report is a great example of how the forms report could be improved. It would be great to include: • Date approved (this may need to contain multiple dates if set-up for mulit-stage approval) • Default location • Default payroll team • Name of submitter • Name of approver (this may need to contain multiple names if set-up for mulit-stage approval)

Can you please add searching function in drop down box in the pay run to find employee? We have over 580 staff and it takes so much time to find the name just scrolling down in the drop down box. We had to go back to the main page to find the certain employee

It is common for organisations to use varied and creative titles for positions that hold managerial or supervisory responsibilities, moving beyond the simple "manager" label. This has created a problem.... e.g. creating and maintaining 28 different approval workflows for a mileage claim form due to organisational positions that hold managerial or supervisory responsibilities having varied position titles. When organisational changes happen, which is quite frequently, the workflow maintenance is complex and additional to the work of just maintaining the organisational structure (and in addition to also maintaining teams in this scenario). If the workflows are not maintained properly it results in employee forms not getting approved in a timely manner (or not at all) and the system being blamed for it... Would it be possible to add a 'Is Manager?' indicator on position titles? When 'Is Manager?' is checked on a position title it could be used in conjunction with the 'reports to' field on the position titles that report to it and then a single approval process could be configured, which ensures that a form goes to a persons direct 'reports to' manager for approval. In the form approval process both the 'Selected positions' and 'Advanced selections' would work perfectly if they had an option to select 'All managers'. Also need to cater for 'managers' submitting form as 'employees' and observe their 'reports to' as well.